<body> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-account' content='ca-host-pub-1556223355139109'/> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-domain' content='blogspot.com'/> <!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(//www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/3334278262-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> </head><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/8090924794253185001?origin\x3dhttps://livethemetallife.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Tuesday, March 2, 2010
















Ok, so this is basically my multiple intelligences results. Analyse it carefully, admire it's vibrant use of colours, the red, the orange, the bright yellow, the calm green. Done? So what I feel is basically this multiple intelligence quiz is not really that effective for firstly, it doesn't explain in detail how they judge, what actions you would normally take. For example, you are outspoken and like to argue, but blah blah blah blah. There is no concrete example to justify their results. Furthermore, when I first took my multiple intelligence quiz, I was under the category auditory and visual, and visual being spatial stuff. And yet in this quiz, my results in the visual/spatial category is my second lowest results, and this confuses me. I may take the quiz again...

ending
9:54 AM


Destroyer

about yourself

Wishlist

anything you wish for

Screams

CBox

Memories

1/4/09 - 1/11/09
1/11/09 - 1/18/09
1/18/09 - 1/25/09
1/25/09 - 2/1/09
2/1/09 - 2/8/09
2/8/09 - 2/15/09
2/15/09 - 2/22/09
2/22/09 - 3/1/09
3/1/09 - 3/8/09
3/8/09 - 3/15/09
3/15/09 - 3/22/09
3/22/09 - 3/29/09
3/29/09 - 4/5/09
4/12/09 - 4/19/09
4/19/09 - 4/26/09
5/10/09 - 5/17/09
5/17/09 - 5/24/09
5/24/09 - 5/31/09
5/31/09 - 6/7/09
6/7/09 - 6/14/09
6/14/09 - 6/21/09
6/28/09 - 7/5/09
7/5/09 - 7/12/09
7/12/09 - 7/19/09
7/26/09 - 8/2/09
8/9/09 - 8/16/09
8/16/09 - 8/23/09
8/23/09 - 8/30/09
8/30/09 - 9/6/09
9/6/09 - 9/13/09
10/11/09 - 10/18/09
10/18/09 - 10/25/09
11/1/09 - 11/8/09
2/7/10 - 2/14/10
2/14/10 - 2/21/10
2/21/10 - 2/28/10
2/28/10 - 3/7/10
3/7/10 - 3/14/10
3/21/10 - 3/28/10
3/28/10 - 4/4/10
4/18/10 - 4/25/10
5/23/10 - 5/30/10
6/6/10 - 6/13/10
6/13/10 - 6/20/10
4/29/12 - 5/6/12
5/20/12 - 5/27/12

Credits.

karen deviantART photobucket blogskins basecode

Now Playing

Not yet
imeem recommended